CORPORATIONS fund their investment by raising capital through equity or debt, or a mixture of both. Of course, the beauty of equity is that it resembles perpetual debt, i.e. there is no obligation to repay while it is not the case for debt. The payoff for equity holders also mimics that of a call option payoff as corporate law limits the maximum loss to an equity investor to his invested amount and no limit to upside gain on his investment.
Debtholders’ returns are finite, while returns on equity vary with the performance. Equity claim over a firm’s assets ranks lower than debtholders and, by nature, interest payment qualifies for tax deduction subject to thin capitalisation and interest restriction rules. All this results in equity being an expensive form of financing as it is apparent that equity holders take more risk than debtholders.
The corporate finance literature provides some light on how firms make the choice of raising financing either through debt or equity. We explain this literature in the simplest and most palatable form as follows:
Trade-off theory
This theory claims that firms have an optimal leverage ratio determined by trading off the tax advantage benefit of interest deductibility against the cost of financial distress. They can do this by moving the leverage ratio towards a target or optimum leverage ratio or letting it vary within an optimal range.
Pecking order theory
It suggests that there is a pecking order in financing corporate investments. Since internally generated funds are the cheapest, firms will resort to this before funding with debt and that since equity is the most expensive form of financing, equity will be the last resort form of financing.
Market timing theory
It claims that firms are more likely to raise funds through equity if they perceive that their stocks are overvalued, and if it’s undervalued, then it would raise funds through debt. It assumes further that the observed leverage ratio is the cumulative attempts by firms to time equity and debt markets.
Empirical evidence on these theories produces mixed results, but like any other social science study, no one school of thought suffices to explain a social behaviour. Corporate finance is no exception to that. However, the literature provides useful informational value in practice to assist sophisticated investors in their investment decision making.
Let us enlighten you with an illustration that is relevant from a recent capital-raising exercise in our Malaysian corporate scene, with Top Glove Corp Bhd’s announcement to Bursa Malaysia on Feb 26, 2021 for its intentions to raise RM7.7 billion through seasoned equity offering of 1.495 billion new shares. The purpose was to finance its production capacity expansion and pursue a dual listing on Hong Kong stock exchange in addition to the Singapore stock exchange. It also has excellent credit ratings.
Top Glove has very low leverage ratios and has the significant potential capacity to increase its debt levels or leverage ratio comfortably following its peer group in the industry. This had the potential benefit to unleash interest rate tax benefits to add to its enterprise value, and its leverage ratio is way below its optimum level.
Moreover, it was sitting on a massive pile of cash too that earns returns less than the capital providers’ expected returns. The reasonable question any investing public would ask is why it did not utilise its cash mountain, including raising debt to finance its expansion, which would have reduced Top Glove’s cost of capital. It appears that Top Glove has not fully explored cheaper funding sources from internal funds or raising debt before heading for a seasoned equity offering.
The share price of Top Glove closed at RM5.24 on its announcement, which was fuelled significantly by the abnormal demand for disposable rubber gloves. However, the sustainability of the abnormal prices for rubber gloves over the near future remains doubtful with planned increase of production capacity and the emergence of vaccines to treat the Covid-19 infections. The timing of the seasoned equity offering subtly points to signal the market that managers viewed that their equity value is overvalued, and their offering can gain higher cash proceeds.
The offering has seen delays and reductions in the amount to be raised. We view that the attraction of the offering lessened because it doesn’t sync well with all the three conceptual theories of capital structure. As of Nov 15, 2021, Top Glove’s share price closed at RM2.49 on Bursa Malaysia.
A basic understanding of capital structure concepts here can be helpful to the investing public in making its investment decision whilst shedding light on a corporation’s underlying purpose of an equity offering. Similarly, the three concepts explained above are also equally applicable when corporations are raising debt. The same concepts also can relay information on a corporation’s financial strategy. We hope that this article is able to impart some fundamental knowledge on corporate finance and provide some clarity on the basic understanding of capital structure.
This article was contributed by Sukh Deve Singh Riar, a business & financial advisor and Roger Loh Kit Seng, associate director of Mazars and member of The Malaysian Institute of Certified Public Accountants (MICPA). The views expressed here are the writers’ own.
Source: The Sun Daily
A word from our sponsor:
Need Help With Your Personal Finance / Money Issue or need a coach to help you structure or just want to learn the financial skill to self manage your financial matters and retirement. iLearnFromCloud.com
Need to solve a problem quickly, now you can solve it by learning the art of problem solving Art Of Problem Solving
Feeling hungry. Latest food news from Best Restaurant To Eat Malaysian Food and Travel Blog
Memory loss. Need to organize better. Solve problem fast with Free Mind Mapping Software Mind Mapping 101
Need A Customized System Development for your business or Going Paperless XPERT TECHNOLOGIES - Empowering The Paperless Economy
No comments:
Post a Comment